03.17.08

ScribeFire

Posted in Software, add-ons, blog at 1:48 pm by RedFlameOut

After looking for quite some time for an add-on to Firefox or IE to ease blog posting, I finally found one — and I like it.

ScribeFire is an add-on for Firefox 2.0 newer. It provides a collapsed, hidden panel at the bottom of the browser. It has various options and allows you to post to more than one blog. Plus, it performs rich text editing i.e. HTML.

You can find it on https://addons.mozilla.org.

My Rating: [5 out of 5]

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

03.06.08

The program can’t download definitions updates Error found: Code 0×80240022

Posted in Software, Windows Defender, Windows Vista at 6:51 am by RedFlameOut

My PC is running Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit with NOD32 antivirus/anti-spyware and Windows Defender.

Windows Defender is not the best anti-spyware however it does have it’s place. NOD32 from ESET does a decent job on spyware and it is one of the best for antivirus so I was happy.

Part of my normal security procedures verifies everything is updating itself properly. Windows Defender had not updated in quite some time so I opened it and manually ran an update. I promptly got the following error:

Windows Defender screen shot showing update error
Arrgh say I!

After a little googling, I found a procedure that fixes the problem. Apparently the definitions have something wrong with them (corruption maybe?) that causes the update to fail.

Here is the procedure that worked for me:

  1. Type Windows-R (Hold the Windows or start key and type an R) to bring up the run dialog box.
  2. Type in cmd.exe and the press ctrl-alt-enter to run it as Administrator. It may ask for escalation privileges so type in your password and press enter if it does.
  3. Use the cd command to change to the Windows Defender directory:cd “\Program Files\Windows Defender”
  4. Run the following commands:mpcmdrun -RemoveDefinitions -All
    mpcmdrun -SignatureUpdate

That is it. It worked for me. Here is a screen shot of an example run of those commands once you have a command window open:

Screen shot of command window running Windows Defender commands

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

03.03.08

A proposal for a change in our government. Part III.

Posted in National, Politics at 6:42 am by RedFlameOut

The War Powers Act

What a load of crock!

The act of going to war, whether it is an actual declaration of war against another sovereign nation, to answer the call of an ally, or a “border action”, is the realm of congressional power only. The presidency can certainly request it of congress however the decision must be with congress only.

The unconstitutional law called the War Powers Act or the War Powers Resolution must be repealed to return balance to our checks and balances system.

The framers of our constitution well understood that there needed to be clear, concise lines of power with each branch of government in charge of its sphere with no legal way to use power from one of the other spheres. Allowing the president to send troops into war situations with out congress approving is, in my mind, tantamount to treason.

Congress is complicit in allowing this unconstitutional law to remain on the books. Yes, I have read the arguments of why it has not been overturned in the courts. It is still a load of crock!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

02.28.08

A proposal for a change in our government. Part II.

Posted in National, Politics, States Rights at 6:34 am by RedFlameOut

This is part 2 of my proposal for changes in the USA government. Based on my previous post, we would have a new election system. Congress would be aligned along two lines - states’ rights and public representation. Congress would also be more diverse.
The presidency would be elected more along the lines the people’s wishes without removing the electoral college — which has functions even in today’s world.

Let’s talk about internal congressional procedures and how one item, bill riders, has skewed our governmental system of checks and balances.

One of the major issues with congress is the rider system. It needs to be outlawed or the president needs a form of line item veto to kill the riders. I favor both methods.

First, congress should not be allowed to add riders that do not directly relate to the pending legislation within the bill. This would kill the “pork” that congress likes to add to bills so that the president won’t veto due to the importance or political environment of the proposed law. Riders should still be allowed however they would need to relate to the bill. For example, a bill dealing with specific types of taxes would only have tax riders of the same type of taxes. A bill dealing with child welfare could only have riders dealing directly with child welfare.

Second, if the president can  veto the bill or the riders or a combination, then this gives the power originally given to the presidency by the constitution back to the president. Riders are an effective way for congress to ram rod through items by attaching them to bills the president can’t or won’t veto. It would not be right for the president to veto parts of a bill. With this proposal, the president would only be able to veto the riders or the bill itself. And if the bill is vetoed, then the riders would be vetoed automatically as well. But if the president vetoes a rider and signs the bill, the bill becomes law without the rider.

Congress would still be allowed to override a veto on a rider or bill in the same manner currently used. Namely, a two thirds vote in congress to override the veto.

By restricting riders and allowing the president limited veto rights on those riders, the intent of the constitution is reinstated. Right now, presidential power is partially usurped by congress with the current rider system.

My next post on this subject will deal with war and war powers. Stay tuned…

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

02.27.08

A proposal for a change in our government. Part I.

Posted in National, Politics, States Rights at 7:07 am by RedFlameOut

Revolution is a big word. It’s scary and denotes fearful change for many.In realizing this, and being a libertarian, I began thinking of ways in which a quiet, friendly revolution could occur without all the apocalyptic upheaval people would fear. I also am concerned with what the government would end up being if a major revolution occurred in the United States of America. So here goes — my thoughts on change.

First, we need to get the power back into the hands of the people away from corporations and special interest groups. To do this we can create new methods that fit within our current framework that would push the power down to the proper levels.To do this, both the Senate and the House of Representatives would have to change. I will speak in a later post on the changes inside congress. For now, I want to discuss who, what, and where the Senators and Representatives are elected.

With the need to balance states rights with the rights of individuals, two houses were created in congress. Unfortunately, both have lost their way.

My first proposal is to remove elections for Senators. They should be assigned by the state legislatures with the number determined by the current system. The Senate’s job would be to balance the states’ rights with individuals and against the House of Representatives.

The second proposal is to remove elections for Representatives. Replace the election system with a lottery of citizens. Pull names out of a hat! Pay would be provided at going rates with travel to Washington DC provided per diem. They would gather information via town hall type meetings for their district and then travel to Washington DC to perform their duties. Indoctrination would take several weeks before congress convenes. The house of Representatives would meet twice a year for 3 months at a time. Once you serve, you get a reprieve of being in the lottery for two terms. No politicking allowed to get “elected”. By selecting the House of Representatives by lottery, the House would be far more diverse in general.

The House and Senate would juxtapose between states and people rights, having to work out compromises on bills that both can agree on before the bill goes to the president for signature or veto.

To better serve the people, the presidential election would still retain the electoral college (it does have its proper use). But, the delegates would be selected based on percentage of win by party. For example, if the Democrats have 50% of the vote, the Republicans 45%, and 5% goes to a third party, then the electoral votes would be split along those lines. So, if the state has 50 electoral votes, 25 would go to the Democrats, 22 would go to the Republicans, and 3 going to the other party. Fractions would be rounded up for the minority parties. If there was no clear winner, then a coalition would have to be put together so that the electoral votes would add up to the majority needed to get a person elected.

I would hope this would slowly change the balance so that other parties have a chance at the national level.

Well, that is it. My first entry in a proposal for changes we should make to our government.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

02.21.08

Boy has it been a long time!

Posted in Personal, blog at 6:52 am by RedFlameOut

Well, my last post was on my birthday — November 20, 2007. I have been ill off and on since then and on a huge project at work that was taking up so much of my time.

My employer has graciously reduced my workload due to my illness.

For anyone reading, regular posts have started. I hope to log at least once every other day.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

11.20.07

Someone asked what my computer is running

Posted in Computers, Technology, Windows Vista at 12:11 am by RedFlameOut

So, here it is:

My computer parts

Category Part Company Site
CPU Intel E6750 overclocked to 3.2 GHz Intel
Main/Motherboard Abit IP35 Pro Abit
Video card Leadtek WinFast PX8800 GTS TDH GeForce 8800GTS 640 MB LeadTek
Memory 2 sets of G.Skill 4 GB (2 x 2 GB) DDR2-800 F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ (8 GB total) G.Skill
Hard Drives Several 750 GB Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD7500AAKS Western Digital
Operating System Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit Microsoft Windows
Keyboard and Mouse Microsoft Wireless keyboard and mouse Microsoft Hardware
CPU Cooler Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro Arctic Cooling
Case Antec Nine Hundred Antec

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

11.19.07

NoteTab Light Mini-review

Posted in Software, Windows at 11:20 pm by RedFlameOut

Over the years, I have used many a program on Windows. NoteTab Light is one such beastie.

NoteTab Light is a free text editor with a tabbed interface. Each tab represents one open text file. It can also be configured to open all files opened at the time of applications closure. The application has a myriad of settings.

At work, I use it to keep various common pieces of text for email in a convenient location. It is configured to minimize and close to the notification area of the task bar so it is only a click away.

Over all, I give NoteTab Light 4 our of 5.

System Requirements (as taken from their web site):

  • Windows 95/98/2000/2003/NT4/ME/XP/XP64/Vista
  • 32 MB of RAM, 4 MB disk space
  • Intel® Pentium processor
  • Site: http://www.notetab.com

    NoteTab Light main screenNoteTab Light Options screen

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    11.12.07

    Long time no write

    Posted in blog at 3:11 am by RedFlameOut

    I have been so busy that my BLOG has suffered. For any one reading, I apologize.

    Work has been a real big headache. More postings will follow this and hopefully more often.

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    10.27.07

    I am sick and tired of the global warming debate!

    Posted in Opinion, Politics at 9:23 pm by RedFlameOut

    First, read this:  Global Warming Alarmism Reaches A Tipping Point

    There is no doubt Earth has warmed. More and more evidence, however, is indicating that warming of our Earth is well within expected variability.

    I don’t have much more to say about this. We do need to reduce pollution output. We do need to be kinder to the environment. We need to think of the consequences of our actions (and no, not the “Precautionary Principle” on steroids please).

    As a race living on the planet together, lets move on to study the climate and environment in a politically neutral manner. Politics has no place in the scientific debate itself (and that especially means you Al Gore)!

    For shame on the scientists that are being alarmist.

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button

    « Previous entries